From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jul 22 00:59:41 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id AAA13077 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jul 1995 00:59:41 -0700 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA13071 for ; Sat, 22 Jul 1995 00:59:38 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id AAA14896; Sat, 22 Jul 1995 00:59:42 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199507220759.AAA14896@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: What people are doing with FBSD To: gurney_j@efn.org (John-Mark Gurney) Date: Sat, 22 Jul 1995 00:59:42 -0700 (PDT) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "John-Mark Gurney" at Jul 22, 95 00:58:41 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1566 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > On Fri, 21 Jul 1995, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > > > > What suggestion? Provide an upgrade path? Trust me, we're working > > > on it! :-) > > > > > > Sorry, I didn't make myself clear. > > > The suggestions refer to (1) seperate the configuration data > > > from the executable scripts such as rc, rc.local, netstart, ...etc. > > > The advantage of seperating the configuration data from the executable scripts > > > is easier to debug for both the user and the developer. > > > > This is work in process. If you look at the 2.0.5R versions of rc, and > > netstart at the top they have clear markers saying that if for some > > reason you need to modify this file we would like to know about it. > > does that mean that I should tell you guys about my addion of the xfs, > xdm, pcnfsd, and bootp stuff to /etc/rc and /etc/sysconfig? I added them in > the tradion of the other options... Yes please, context or uni diffs are nice :-). Though xfs, xdm and pcnfsd are not part of the system and thus belong in /etc/rc.local as a sight specific thing (rc.local is going to dissappear some day very soon from the distribution and will truely become an optional site specific file so that we do not over write any current version of it). bootp does need to go in, so that looks like the only real one you have for me :-). And it is one I some how still have missing from my current work :-( -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD