Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 03 Aug 2007 23:58:47 +0200
From:      Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ldconfig when PACKAGE_BUILDING=YES (and linux ports)
Message-ID:  <1186178328.46188.2.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
In-Reply-To: <52921778@bsam.ru>
References:  <52921778@bsam.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-86zssniejXQeewz0vPHL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Boris Samorodov p=ED=B9e v so 04. 08. 2007 v 01:30 +0400:

> Seems that running ldconfig while building a package at package
> cluster (i.e. when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined) is quite useless. [1]
>=20
> To be more specific I'm interested at linux ports. ATM we run linux
> ldconfig (using linuxulator) _at package building_. Hence to create a
> package for FC6 port we should change compat.linux.osrelease (which I
> don't like and try to avoid). If the "ldconfig" stage may be skipped
> when PACKAGE_BUILDING is defined then things get way too easier both
> for default kernel linux.osrelease and default linux_base port change.

I don't follow - what is the problem?

--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>

Said Helvetica Narrow to Helvetica Bold: "Hey, you're just my type."

--=-86zssniejXQeewz0vPHL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBGs6UUntdYP8FOsoIRAtiPAJwJtmu/h3FwVUEXB8iElGGdrTsIrQCdGN9L
TzgquRC6fA4DvMusi1gFCuc=
=6x9W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-86zssniejXQeewz0vPHL--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1186178328.46188.2.camel>