From owner-freebsd-security Thu Jan 9 15:19:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA27450 for security-outgoing; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 15:19:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA27441 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 15:19:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.2/8.7.3) id JAA28530; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 09:48:41 +1030 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199701092318.JAA28530@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: sendmail running non-root SUCCESS In-Reply-To: <19970109190847.12307.qmail@spitfire.ecsel.psu.edu> from Dan Cross at "Jan 9, 97 02:08:47 pm" To: tenser@spitfire.ecsel.psu.edu (Dan Cross) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 09:48:39 +1030 (CST) Cc: lyndon@esys.ca, moke@fools.ecpnet.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Dan Cross stands accused of saying: > > Perhaps I'm being naive here, but what's the pressure to stick with > sendmail? Why not move to a more reliable and efficient MTA, like > Qmail? Please don't drag this one out _again_. Go off and read the -security mail archive if you want the text of the discussion. BTW, Peter, where's that handbook entry you were going to write on Qmail? > - Dan C. -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[