Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 19:44:08 +0100 From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com> To: "Terry Lambert" <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: in-kernel HTTP Server for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <00a601c1b8ac$426670a0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> References: <20020217143343.41758.qmail@web21104.mail.yahoo.com> <xzp4rkgf7n7.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020217163045.GB90303@voi.aagh.net> <3C703089.AD03554B@mindspring.com> <018501c1b816$2a9cb970$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C705564.E1EA2FDA@mindspring.com> <001c01c1b859$6ee18c80$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C70E8B2.168D9F56@mindspring.com> <010101c1b87a$10707190$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C7146A9.931F07EF@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry writes: > Regedit can run from the command line and > take a file name as an argument. If you can configure IIS from the command line with regedit, you have the patience of a saint. Just sifting through GUIDs takes all day, and that's _with_ documentation. > This is circular reasoning. So is your reasoning that leads you to call me atypical, as below. > Reading about it is not good enough. Doing > it is good enough; watching professionals with > many years of experience doing it is better. So how many points does being a professional with many years of experience garner? > Your preference for comand line and file > interfaces with high learning curves. Cf. your comment on circular reasoning, above. > Regedit. Regedit is not practical. > But you've already backed off from the web > based interface being a requirement, by ceding > that is also a native GUI interface. It wasn't my argument that it is a requirement. That was your argument, in your attempt to show why a dedicated, kernel-located HTTP server might be necessary. > All else, including stability? No, since stability is the dependent variable. > I personally don't think they exist. I'm > questioning your implied premise here. It was your inference, not my implication. > I guess by asking this, you are also questioning > your implied premise. See above. > I substantiate my statements with references > to Computer Science literature. Some computer-science literature was written by me. Does the fact that I put pen to paper guarantee that anything I write is fact? > You aren't substantiating your at all. Neither are you. See above. You're just pointing to someone else who makes claims similar to yours. That does not make them valid. > If you want to pick out what you think is an > unsubstantiated opinion in one of my postings, > where I haven't explicitly stated it (I generally > state it, as you pointed out), I can back it up > with a cite from the literature for you. If you want to substantiate your opinions, start with axioms accepted by all and reason forward from there. Citations are valueless. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00a601c1b8ac$426670a0$0a00000a>