From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 7 05:02:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4758C16A4CE for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 05:02:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F35843D1F for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 05:02:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 31265 invoked by uid 89); 7 Aug 2004 05:02:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Aug 2004 05:02:57 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BEC152; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 08:02:56 +0300 (EEST) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 739B6148; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 08:02:56 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 08:02:56 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: "Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN]" Message-Id: <20040807080256.7cb115db@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20040807063258.mieyowo0w4oc0kko@www.x123.info> References: <20040807004954.7qcgcwwk8c4o04c8@www.x123.info> <20040807022748.7ec3621b@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20040807031953.4v4cw0wo0kwos408@www.x123.info> <20040807044137.2973b653@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20040807063258.mieyowo0w4oc0kko@www.x123.info> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Probability: -1.0000 X-CLAMAV-Result: Clean cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: dspam returning -5 on submiting spam (was: Re: dspam-devel 3.1.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 05:02:59 -0000 On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 06:32:58 +0200 "Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN]" wrote: > ----- Message from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com --------- Date: Sat, 7 > Aug 2004 > 04:41:37 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Reply-To: > Ion-Mihai Tetcu Subject: Re: dspam-devel 3.1.0 > To: "Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN]" [ ... ] > > Could you please sent the output of postconf -n and dspam --version, a > > snip of maillog, a snip of /usr/local/etc/dspam/sql.error and snip of > > dspam.messages all corresponding to one message. Do a touch > > /usr/local/etc/dspam/.debug before the test message. > first of all sorry for the un-warped.. > > Ok now i have just fixed the false alarm problem (query error: verbose debug: > see sql.errors for more details) > > I rebuilded my port without rm -r /var/db/ports/dspam-devel ;) make rmconfig was intended in place of that. > > Ok but i still have the Spam reporting problem it return -5 > > ** > /etc/mail/aliases > spam-esn: "|/usr/local/bin/dspam --user esn --class=spam --source=error > --mode=teft" ok. > > ** > postconf -n [ ... an usual postfix with mailbox_cmd set correctly ] > ** > dspam --version > Configuration parameters: --disable-debug --disable-verbose-debug [...] --enable-signature-headers ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ When you *forward* the mail back to dpsam the original mail's headers are not passed, hence dspam gets a message that it knows is has been bad classified, but it does not know on which tokens he has do do the retraining since the X-DSPAM-Signature is not in the email. Either *bounce* the message or disable that option. This is covered in the dspam README, about which the pkg-message tells you in its beginning. If that doesn't help I really need debug output. Please recompile with debug (no need for verbose debug, I hope), create a .debug file in DSPAM_HOME and give me the content of dspam.debug. (If you recompile with verbose debug, give also sql.error). -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"