Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:17:07 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197557] databases/pgworksheet: Take MAINTAINER(ship) add LICENSE fix WWW Message-ID: <bug-197557-13-fF206OqYme@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-197557-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-197557-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197557 --- Comment #4 from Chris Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #2) > Thanks for your submission Christer, > > Unless you're part of the upstream project for pgworksheet, I'm not sure the > change added to pkg-descr is warranted. MAINTAINER=<email> already speaks to > who the current maintainer is. > > If you are indeed working with upstream, then it may be worth clarifying in > pkg-descr that you are the 'port' maintainer, unless you intended something > different. Good advise. Thank you. I have indicated my intention(s) upstream. Also; as the previous WWW provides no support/indication for pgworksheet. pgworksheet seemed better served having a page that reflects it's usage, intentions, and support. So the change in the WWW seemed warranted. > > Please update the patch accordingly, and if applicable. Done, in new svn diff attached. > > Also, if a port is unmaintained, you can use the term "Take MAINTAINERship" > rather than "Request" maintainership. The latter implies an existing > maintainer, and requires approval. The person committing the change should > check for approval in any case. Thank you, Kubilay Kocak. I appreciate the clarity you provided on that, and will do so, going forward. Thank you very much for all your help! --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-197557-13-fF206OqYme>