Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 20:03:28 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194276] [new port] net/p5-Net-Nmsg Message-ID: <bug-194276-13-YLiCLKwRmT@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-194276-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-194276-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194276 Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #148147|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #2 from Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> --- Created attachment 148998 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=148998&action=edit updated shar file containing Makefile, distinfo, pkg-descr, pkg-plist for net/p5-Net-Nmsg In the past I've run into problems with using a wildcard with PORTEXAMPLES and/or PORTDATA (but never PORTDOCS) unless I used a .if wrapper. It might have been order dependent, but I've never seen the order vs. the .include documented, and portlint doesn't complain about either ordering. Since this seems to be working without the wrapper and in the order you suggest, update the shar file with the simpler Makefile. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194276-13-YLiCLKwRmT>