Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:01:15 +0200 From: "xer" <xernet@hotmail.it> To: <pyunyh@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: watchdog timeout Message-ID: <BAY126-DS636DEDE91BD300E310A8FA3800@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <20090410044340.GJ37714@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20090407120032.633E410656D5@hub.freebsd.org> <BAY126-DS446FD5BE2D016BDCD821AA3820@phx.gbl> <20090410044340.GJ37714@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you Pyun I found this another one: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=129352 And it seems a lot different.. which one will bet to try? Regards -------------------------------------------------- From: "Pyun YongHyeon" <pyunyh@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 6:43 AM To: "xer" <xernet@hotmail.it> Cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: watchdog timeout > > I vaguely remember there were a couple of reports on xl(4) watchdog > timeouts. I'm not sure this came from missing Tx interrupts but > would you try attached patch? > Note, it was generated against HEAD and you should experiment the > attached patch on local box prior to applying to your production > server. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BAY126-DS636DEDE91BD300E310A8FA3800>