From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 14 11:48:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B9816A4CE for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:48:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FF3543D48 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:48:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tomonage2@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 27837 invoked by uid 65534); 14 Oct 2004 11:47:59 -0000 Received: from pD90533C8.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.0.196]) (217.5.51.200) by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 14 Oct 2004 13:47:59 +0200 X-Authenticated: #7843803 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.0.0.040405 Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:47:53 +0200 From: Jonathan Weiss To: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200410141332.27469.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Subject: AW: alternative options for ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:48:04 -0000 > El Jueves, 14 de Octubre de 2004 13:20, Jose M Rodriguez escribi=F3: >> El Jueves, 14 de Octubre de 2004 11:53, Sergei Kolobov escribi=F3: >>> On 2004-10-14 at 00:54 +0200, Sebastian Schulze Struchtrup wrote: >>>> I thought of a way to specify configurations to build several > [ ... ] >>>=20 >>> FLAVOURS=3D gtk kde athena >>>=20 >>> which produces the corresponding vim-gtk, vim-kde, and vim-athena >>> packages from a *signle* port, without a need to create a multitude >>> of slave ports. >>>=20 >>> Is there anybody working to bring this feature in our bsd.port.mk? >>>=20 >>> Sergei >>=20 >> It not so esay. OpenBSD port system is binary oriented (And I think >> NetBSD pkgsrc also). Even installing from ports, they make first de >> package and then install. >>=20 >=20 > It must say: >=20 > It's not so easy. OpenBSD ports system is binary oriented (like rpm and > NetBSD pkgsrc, I think). Even installing from ports, they make first a > package and then install from that. BTW, I like this approach much more! Make a package out of the port and then install it, it is much more meaningful . Also the 'make package' target in OpenBSD does not install the package as i= n FreeBSD, also more meaningful . Greets, Jonathan