From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 22 01:15:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DCF16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 01:15:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9DD43D45
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 01:15:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5M1Ei2o024765;
	Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:14:44 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:14:46 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20040621.191446.45217670.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <23206.1087846355@critter.freebsd.dk>
References: <23206.1087846355@critter.freebsd.dk>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] retire TIOCDCDTIMESTAMP
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 01:15:19 -0000

In message: <23206.1087846355@critter.freebsd.dk>
            Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
: The RFC 2783 PPS-API has been standardized to do everything
: TIOCDCDTIMESTAMP did and quite a bit more.

I think this is reasonable on its face.  Unless this breaks a bunch of
ports I don't see a big problem with it.  I have some problems using
pps api at times, but those aren't relevant for this change...

Warner