From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 23 02:56:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452E21065708 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FFD8FC0C for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 5so1233369qwi.7 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:56:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:received :message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority :importance; bh=jR5ARqPqVX1FA0+wF1zAmH/8l5nfIZDM74KPID+tNQ4=; b=MVSTMV6gIGbMkJf71PfqnBQMb14iQBHTSxWrft5q4ARWsCdDZlOy0XcZPHo64zYEzN V4eX9qKIpfHUYck9tn0wYX0IVoGRE9N4nsAoK6jaZa8SjqxXCCjoFY9REGnv2lwMreAh ZHX3c3HRlceYRYf9vzHn8bfrDndZnVZNLnhW4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-priority:importance; b=bMZD5/uxTsNMb+izbwN/RCbdTy0ZSR/WsGW60HWHNLRrg2q9d83lWAZ3Qxj6Kj85Nc It/+pdGNNq+BiqeZuhrT/LT4a51glaUP5N006qDfQ/79oY2ZwR57BHGbP/TD65OYfSyL 6DgbkKjbcku6W3OzSQu/vnn+dF+duyUAL7bFY= Received: by 10.224.27.34 with SMTP id g34mr1538952qac.19.1269312976084; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cygnus.homeunix.com ([189.71.112.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm10098492qwf.14.2010.03.22.19.56.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:56:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Nenhum_de_Nos Received: by cygnus.homeunix.com (Postfix, from userid 80) id 6724AB8A1E; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:55:57 -0300 (BRT) Received: from 10.1.1.100 (SquirrelMail authenticated user matheus) by lamneth with HTTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:55:57 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20100322150534.032bee30@mail.sstec.com> References: <5.2.1.1.2.20100322150534.032bee30@mail.sstec.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:55:57 -0300 (BRT) From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: Powerd and est / eist functionality X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:56:17 -0000 On Mon, March 22, 2010 19:57, John Long wrote: > dmesg shows > cpu0: on acpi0 > est0: on cpu0 > est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. > est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 6160b2506000b25 > device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 > p4tcc0: on cpu0 > cpu1: on acpi0 > est1: on cpu1 > est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. > est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 6160b2506000b25 > device_attach: est1 attach returned 6 > p4tcc1: on cpu1 I get similar output on 8-STABLE and C2Q 9400/9450. wasn't it supposed to attach ok ? matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style