From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 14 9:44: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-67.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9F137B491 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:43:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 869BB66B33; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:43:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:43:55 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Tom Cc: Terry Rossi , Michael DeMutis , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Named crashing Message-ID: <20010214094355.C72669@mollari.cthul.hu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jousvV0MzM2p6OtC" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from tom@uniserve.com on Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 08:36:24AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --jousvV0MzM2p6OtC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 08:36:24AM -0800, Tom wrote: > Some named version have a nice remote crash bug, and there are people > who are going and crashing all the DNS servers they can find. It's much worse than that - as you'd know if you read the FreeBSD security advisories (01:18 in this case) > 3.5-STABLE seems to have Bind 8.2.2, which is vunerable. 4.2-RELEASE No it doesn't. > sould also seem to have a vunerable version. See http://www.isc.org from Yes it does - see the above advisory. Kris --jousvV0MzM2p6OtC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6isPaWry0BWjoQKURArB+AJ9dPG6kxTDmoS/L3CSHETQlFQFH0QCg9qT3 WRLhapY2dfEnpoDQZOGLjcY= =Zb+0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jousvV0MzM2p6OtC-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message