From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 18 7:25: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BC837B9DB for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 07:25:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA09796; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 09:23:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 09:23:32 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which Quake World port to use under FreeBSD 4.0 Message-ID: <20000418092331.A7867@dan.emsphone.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.9i In-Reply-To: ; from "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" on Tue Apr 18 15:58:50 GMT 2000 X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In the last episode (Apr 18), Alexey N. Dokuchaev said: > I've been able to find several versions of Quake World 2.30, among > them linux libc5, linux glibc and bsdi ports. > > Maybe there are some source code of qw, so I can compile it on > FreeBSD? You're in luck :) The Quakeforge project is what you're looking for. The version in our ports tree is a bit old, though. Just go to www.quakeforge.net and download one of the qf-current snapshots. > Anyway, the question is: which is better to use from those three? Is > BSDi emulation better that linux's? If you want to use the old binaries, both the BSD/OS and Linux executables work about the same. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message