From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 18 22:59:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29051065786 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:59:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mozolevsky@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F5F8FC1D for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadi14 with SMTP id i14so853111dad.13 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:59:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=minX+S2aic8U0/1FLD5+nLiPUeCo9VZJjdH+0F6F1Jc=; b=K+ieBzDbJrGxTTuXdiiucuITX3cFtkCB4jk49TTJ97CysASmDPaMRWKcUhnRMVTkgG onOhD7GilzdG+c6iqdll+BVuWO0QG8huqdPO6dhOHSpeMGJxhAH/FWyBoxkdZx2MZIKe zcEHQjOFwKkNJ+79sWUoxseKuO0mnLlCCI6S4= Received: by 10.68.73.6 with SMTP id h6mr46714302pbv.116.1326927581124; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:59:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: mozolevsky@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.28.199 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:59:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9A11510C-CEC7-463F-9479-CA6183C7359E@exonetric.com> References: <4F16094E.2080108@FreeBSD.org> <92707DFD-08E9-4797-A219-B7AD5B6AD312@exonetric.com> <9A11510C-CEC7-463F-9479-CA6183C7359E@exonetric.com> From: Igor Mozolevsky Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:59:00 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DZQD6qTZrbMu2waIyEqffCM3daA Message-ID: To: Mark Blackman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:59:42 -0000 On 18 January 2012 22:53, Mark Blackman wrote: > > On 18 Jan 2012, at 22:50, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > >> On 18 January 2012 22:31, Mark Blackman wrote: >> >>> 10.0 - Nov 2013 >> >> I think 10.0 should be released based on feature-readiness and not on >> some arbitrary date=E2=80=A6 > > You can always redefine the feature-set to meet the date. :) Yes, but there's a difference between releasing because it's the right thing to do now vs releasing because it's about time... -- Igor M. :-)