From owner-freebsd-scsi  Sat Jan 25 10:07:55 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA10477
          for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Sat, 25 Jan 1997 10:07:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA10470
          for <scsi@freebsd.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 1997 10:07:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1)
	id E0voCVq-00031I-00; Sat, 25 Jan 1997 11:07:34 -0700
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
Subject: Re: Question about the scsi sub system. 
Cc: scsi@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 25 Jan 1997 18:34:05 +0100."
		<Mutt.19970125183405.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
References: <Mutt.19970125183405.j@uriah.heep.sax.de>  <E0vo1Ma-00025B-00@rover.village.org> 
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1997 11:07:34 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Message-Id: <E0voCVq-00031I-00@rover.village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <Mutt.19970125183405.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> J Wunsch writes:
: Move the START UNIT command earlier in the sdopen() function.  I've
: already did this for the `cd' and `od' driver, and at least in the
: latter case, it works fine.  (I'm running the `od' driver with an
: automatic spindown at odclose().)

I noticed that in the sd and cd drivers, the start unit command are
placed in the same location, relative to eachother.  Is this in your
private copy?  In a branch that I'm missing?

Anyway, I'm going to try moving scsi_start_unit() to before the
scsi_test_unit_ready() call and see if that helps or not.  Thanks for
the suggestion!

Warner