From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Apr 17 00:04:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA14277 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA14264 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:04:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA11410; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 00:04:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: Doug White To: Andre Albsmeier cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is correct: "device st0" or "tape st0" In-Reply-To: <199704150828.KAA04284@curry.mchp.siemens.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > device st0 #SCSI tapes > > Now what is correct: The upper, commented out line with "tape" or > the lower line with "device"? Or doesn't it matter if I declare > my tape as "tape" or "device"? We've always used 'device', but 'tape' is a recent addition that config may handle appropriately (ie, tape=device). Haven't tried it. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major