From owner-freebsd-current Fri Aug 27 21:51: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rah.star-gate.com (216-200-29-190.snj0.flashcom.net [216.200.29.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF96F15512 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 21:50:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA95500 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 21:49:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199908280449.VAA95500@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Mucho Bandwith Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 21:49:01 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The claim of this arcticle is that the researchers are at a lost of what to do with their CA*Net3 network (80 giga bits /second ). http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/CuttingEdge/canadanet990827.html Hmmm... I wonder what would happen if ftp.freebsd.org was moved to CA*Net3 8) I am sure that some on the list can figure out other creative uses like clustering. Enjoy -- Amancio Hasty hasty@rah.star-gate.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message