From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 23 18:31:58 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA03055 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 23 Jun 1995 18:31:58 -0700 Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA03049 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 1995 18:31:57 -0700 Received: (from henrich@localhost) by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA00341; Fri, 23 Jun 1995 21:32:37 -0400 From: Charles Henrich Message-Id: <199506240132.VAA00341@crh.cl.msu.edu> Subject: Re: Memory leak somewhere? To: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 1995 21:32:37 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199506230854.KAA06398@blaise.ibp.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at Jun 23, 95 10:54:26 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 464 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Relink the server with either -lgnumalloc or -ldlmalloc (found in > ports/devel/libdlmalloc). The libc's malloc take as much as two times the > memory needed per allocation. > > I think we should throw away the libc's malloc and adopt another one. Wow, that worked wonders, my S3 server is small again (well so far) woohoo! -Crh Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu http://rs560.msu.edu/~henrich/