From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 6 12:17:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC98F10656D3; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 12:17:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639378FC19; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 12:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id PAA01838; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:17:42 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4C84DBE6.5010809@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:17:42 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100823 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <201007141414.o6EEEUx9014690@lurza.secnetix.de> <4C782D3B.6020407@icyb.net.ua> <201008271743.29393.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4C7835E6.6070309@icyb.net.ua> <4C7A2782.5040009@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4C7A2782.5040009@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jung-uk Kim Subject: Re: patch for topology detection of Intel CPUs X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:17:45 -0000 on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following: > The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied > either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c depending > on the desired architecture: > http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/intel-cpu-topo.diff I see that I am not getting as many testers as I expected, so I am going to commit the patch. You still have a short while to either objectively object to the patch or to voluntary test it :-) -- Andriy Gapon