Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 Aug 2019 05:49:12 -0700
From:      Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann@walstatt.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, mckusick@mckusick.com
Subject:   Re: CURRENT: supeblock hash failure - CURRENT wrecking disks
Message-ID:  <39FB31E6-A8EC-484C-B297-39C19A787E44@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190807103725.3d06ceca@freyja>
References:  <20190807103725.3d06ceca@freyja>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(CCing Kirk)

> On Aug 7, 2019, at 01:37, O. Hartmann <ohartmann@walstatt.org> wrote:
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> today I ran into a ctastrophy with r350671. After installing a fresh compi=
led
> system and rebooted the box, UEFI loader dropped a bunch of errors, like s=
ome
> hex numbers stating, that a hash/superblock has is wrong and then the boot=
ing
> stopped at the OK loader prompt.
>=20
> Rebooting the machine with the FreeBSD-13-CURRENT image from 1st August 20=
19
> and trying to fsck the filesystem(s) on the boot SSD (UFS2, journaling and=
 trim
> on), lots of unresolved block errors occured. But that didn't help much.
> Further, after several checks, I saw some commits to the ffs code recently=
 adn
> tried to restore a copy of the superblock of each filesystem (in contrary t=
o
> the man page for fsck_ufs, the first backup superblock resides in 192, not=

> 160!). But things then get even worse, it seems the whole /boot structure i=
s
> corrupted, the loader can not find the recent kernel and kernel.old is cra=
shing.
>=20
> What's wrong here :-(
>=20
> regards,
> oh



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39FB31E6-A8EC-484C-B297-39C19A787E44>