Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:41:42 +0200 From: Eric Masson <emss@free.fr> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] ZFS v15 patch (version 3) Message-ID: <86tynweacp.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org> In-Reply-To: <i14q67$sor$1@dough.gmane.org> (Ivan Voras's message of "Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:17:42 %2B0200") References: <4C31C71C.2010606@FreeBSD.org> <4C34A593.7060101@dataix.net> <4C34C567.2030408@FreeBSD.org> <86ocejjfoj.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org> <4C3509A2.3050700@continum.net> <i14q67$sor$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> writes: Hello Ivan, > I'm not a Solaris guy but from > http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Project+comstar/ it looks like > COMSTAR does something similar to what FreeBSD's GEOM does now. Ok. It seems to me that COMSTAR provides one functionality that GEOM misses, a generic SCSI target with plugins for different transports. It seems this overlaps with CAM. Having the same level of functionality as OSol regarding iSCSI exports of ZVols would be really nice. I plan to deploy a storage server @home and OSol seems pretty desirable in this area (native iSCSI for ZVols & smb for ZFS filesystems, all imho nicely integrated). Regards Eric Masson -- J'ai pas tout compris... Tu fais ta répartie et tu te proposes au GNU en même temps ? C'est vrai que ça mérite le GNU, mais peut-être pas pour ce que tu crois... -+- BQL in GNU : Gnutez moi, gnutez moi, gnutez moiiiii ça... -+-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86tynweacp.fsf>