From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Nov 11 01:40:30 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA04060
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 11 Nov 1996 01:40:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.6])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA04055
          for <FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 11 Nov 1996 01:40:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from baloon.mimi.com (sjx-ca18-20.ix.netcom.com [199.35.223.180]) by dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id BAA09192; Mon, 11 Nov 1996 01:39:51 -0800
Received: (from asami@localhost) by baloon.mimi.com (8.8.2/8.6.12) id BAA08673; Mon, 11 Nov 1996 01:39:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 01:39:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199611110939.BAA08673@baloon.mimi.com>
To: chuckr@glue.umd.edu
CC: FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.3.95.961110103315.17739A-100000@fiber.eng.umd.edu> (message from Chuck Robey on Sun, 10 Nov 1996 10:44:47 -0500 (EST))
Subject: Re: blt2.1
From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Most people don't build packages, do they?  I mean, we could alter the
 * road from cleaned to to delivered package, without inconveniencing most
 * folks, right?

You are right.  I was thinking about another variable,
PACKAGE_BUILDING, that I (and anybody elso who builds packages) should 
set, which would then build the port with the "least common
denominator" (?) configuration you are talking about.

So, for this case, it should be something like:

.if defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING)
pre-patch:
	${CP} ${FILESDIR}/ignore-itcl-patch ${PATCHDIR}/patch-00
pre-clean:
	${RM} ${PATCHDIR}/patch-00
.endif

Makes sense?

Satoshi