From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 9 05:59:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033B2106564A for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 05:59:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [78.111.72.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35CAA8FC17 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 05:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84794 invoked by uid 80); 9 Sep 2011 05:33:05 -0000 Received: from 164.61.223.12 ([164.61.223.12]) by avocado.salatschuessel.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:33:05 +0200 Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:33:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20110909073305.Horde.oi-EGaQd9PdOaaURAsTRVJk@avocado.salatschuessel.net> From: Oliver Lehmann To: Mike Tancsa References: <20110908221356.Horde.MFEsZ6Qd9PdOaSIEaid2X_A@avocado.salatschuessel.net> <4E692F87.5010708@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <4E692F87.5010708@sentex.net> User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H4 (5.0.9) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvsup broken on amd64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 05:59:48 -0000 Mike Tancsa wrote: > Just curious as to why you need cvsup and not instead use csup that is > in the base ? I got used to it in the past 12 years? But this is not realy the question. If it is "BROKEN" it should be marked as BROKEN or there should be a statement that it will not work with FreeBSD 9 on at least amd64 or we will have other users complaining about the same at least when 9.0 RELEASE is out - right?