From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 21 10:36:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA07551 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 10:36:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sdcc10.ucsd.edu (sdcc10.ucsd.edu [132.239.50.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA07546 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 10:36:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from crouilla@ucsd.edu) Received: from localhost (crouilla@localhost) by sdcc10.ucsd.edu (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id KAA13245; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 10:35:58 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: sdcc10.ucsd.edu: crouilla owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 10:35:58 -0800 (PST) From: Chuck Rouillard Reply-To: chuck@ucsd.edu To: "Jan B. Koum " cc: daniel lawrence , Wes Peters , Greg Lehey , Kelly Yancey , freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tell Micro$oft what you think In-Reply-To: <19981121032230.A699@best.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [snip] > > Wes Peters wrote: > > > Greg Lehey wrote: [chop] > > HELLO!?!? > With all due respect to all of you, I fail to see how all this > "lets kill MS crap" is part of FreeBSD advocacy. Maybe I am > the only one missing something here though? > > -- Yan I somewhat agree with Yan. We shouldn't be giving 'them' more bandwidth on -Advocacy than our own beloved O/S, no? In the words of Donald Trumpp: "Bad press is better than no press at all". -chuck To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message