Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 Feb 1999 20:07:15 -0600
From:      David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>
To:        "Kevin T. Likes" <klikes@isd.state.in.us>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: exmh 2.0.2 and wish8.0 eating memory on 3.0 
Message-ID:  <199902090207.UAA98919@nospam.hiwaay.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from "Kevin T. Likes" <klikes@isd.state.in.us>  of "Mon, 08 Feb 1999 15:27:57 EST." <199902082027.PAA01803@jaka.isd.state.in.us> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Kevin T. Likes" writes:
> 
> I'm running exmh on a 3.0-Stable system, installed from binaries.  I've
> reinstalled exmh 2.0.2 and tcl and tk 8.0.4 since the upgrade, which I
> believe were the same versions running on the box before I upgraded.

Since you mention it, just looked at what wish8.0 was doing on my system
right now with exmh (3.0-stable, mostly elf). Eek! 10952k RES and SIZE
of 11528k according to top. Going to have to break down and print the
mutt manual and learn something new. Maybe procmail too.

Possibly what is the final straw to break exmh's back is that sendmail 
no longer accepts messages from my exmh unless I have a live DNS 
connection. Good old:

post: problem initializing server; [RPLY] 451 <dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net>... Sender domain must resolve
send: message not delivered to anyone

Hacked out the 451 reject rule in /etc/sendmail.cf, got another 
message. Hacked that one out, got yet another. And finally got a 
message I couldn't figure out where it was stopping. Didn't like the 
idea of clobering the default anti-spam sendmail rules, so either exmh 
goes or sendmail 8.9. Not much of a choice, not when mutt looks 
interesting.

nmh-1.0 was announced the past week. Not sure if its in ports yet. But 
maybe replacing mh-6.8.4 with nmh will fix my mh/sendmail problem.

--
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net
=====================================================================
The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its
capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902090207.UAA98919>