From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 04:36:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA0B16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:36:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mygirlfriday.info (mo-65-41-216-204.sta.sprint-hsd.net [65.41.216.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86B4543D2D for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:36:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gv-list-freebsdquestions@mygirlfriday.info) Received: (qmail 45804 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2004 04:36:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO major.mygirlfriday.info) (192.168.0.5) by mongo.mygirlfriday.info with SMTP; 27 Jul 2004 04:36:11 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:36:11 -0500 From: Gary Organization: Hardly X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1382249088.20040726233611@mygirlfriday.info> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <20040726211831.121c9df9.y2kbug@ms25.hinet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[2]: implementing spf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 04:36:13 -0000 Hi Kevin / Robert, On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:39:59 -0700 (PDT) UTC (7/26/2004, 12:39 PM -0500 UTC my time), Kevin Stevens and On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Robert Storey wrote in part: >> Specifically: >> >> 1) Is the technology useful? >> >> 2) How does one implement spf on the server side? >> >> 3) How does one implement spf on the client side? >> >> I most interested in No. 3 above - specifically, is there anything that >> I must do as an end-user to make use of spf? K> As an end-user, nothing. http://spf.pobox.com/users.html. Same site for K> a general FAQ which addresses implementation (it's done via DNS records). K> The Slashdot article had a link to the Microsoft implementation; the K> complaint about it is that they are releasing a free license to implement, K> which can be revoked at any time. For the other side of the coin, regarding SPF.. we have....... -- Gary