Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:58:36 -0800 From: Max Khon <fjoe@freebsd.org> To: Johann Visagie <johann@egenetics.com> Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mailman Makefile pkg-deinstall pkg-descr ports/mail/mailman/files pkg-opts Message-ID: <20020219125836.A13411@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20020219153204.GJ15231@fling.sanbi.ac.za>; from johann@egenetics.com on Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 05:32:04PM %2B0200 References: <200202191358.g1JDwtx82740@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020219072013.A19783@ninja1.internal> <20020219153204.GJ15231@fling.sanbi.ac.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, there! On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 05:32:04PM +0200, Johann Visagie wrote: > > > Revision Changes Path > > > 1.1 +27 -0 ports/mail/mailman/files/pkg-opts (new) > > > > Would it be reasonable to put this in the base directory for the port > > instead? > > This is currently not a standard element of the port, so I decided to > stick in in $FILESDIR with all the other miscellaneous files making up > the port. > > > In the hopes of providing a standardized way for documenting > > Makefile build options (hint hint), it seems excessive to have a files > > directory for every port. > > I agree. What do people think about making this - or something like it > - standard? I'm all for it /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020219125836.A13411>