From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Nov 17 16: 8:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5868F37B401 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:08:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191E543E75 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:08:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8764D8A1A4C; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:08:37 -0400 (AST) Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 20:08:37 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Chat Subject: Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS? In-Reply-To: <05d201c28e95$b75ecd70$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Message-ID: <20021117200529.S23359-100000@hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Mattias writes: > > > And they still won't find all bugs. > > It's almost impossible to find all bugs in any non-trivial software > product. However, that is not an excuse for not making an effort to find > as many as possible. Exactly, but if there is not sufficient support for those willing to do that effort, it makes it very difficult ... that's why I think there almost might need to be a stable-qa list that some of us can have a more focused ear of the developers on ... not for build related issues, only stability related ... if I can't build the system, I don't install it, I just wait a few days and try again ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message