From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 03:41:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA5516A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 03:41:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org (asylum.afflictions.org [64.7.134.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECA843D46 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 03:41:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from dementia.afflictions.org (dementia.afflictions.org [172.19.206.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FE678C7C for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:42:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by dementia.afflictions.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0A958170C6; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:41:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:41:18 -0400 From: Damian Gerow To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040622034117.GC85388@afflictions.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20040622033307.1CE4043D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <20040622033701.GB85388@afflictions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040622033701.GB85388@afflictions.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT on a i386 X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3D7 D901 A53A 1A99 BFD6 E6DF 9F3B 742B C288 9CC9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: current build broken in another spot X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 03:41:18 -0000 Thus spake Damian Gerow (dgerow@afflictions.org) [21/06/04 23:38]: : See a post earlier today from David -- binutils should have been : disconnected from the build. i.e. AFAIK, you shouldn't even be seeing this. : Try re-sup'ing, and building again. (Is this even related to binutils, or : is it an internal error?) Ignore me, that's just GDB info files, not all of binutils. However, my binutils just compiled fine.