From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Sep 27 01:14:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA08802 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 01:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com (root@gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com [207.113.159.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA08781; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 01:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com (root@sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com [192.168.241.191]) by gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id BAA23841; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 01:11:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com (salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com [192.168.241.194]) by sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA10855; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 01:11:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gdonl@localhost) by salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA00487; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 01:11:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Message-Id: <199709270811.BAA00487@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 01:11:51 -0700 In-Reply-To: "Rodney W. Grimes" "Re: 'fxp' driver/hardware lossage (was Re: Alexander B. Povol's mail)" (Sep 26, 11:10pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 alpha(3) 7/19/95) To: "Rodney W. Grimes" , dg@root.com Subject: Re: 'fxp' driver/hardware lossage (was Re: Alexander B. Povol's mail) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, tarkhil@mgt.msk.ru, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sep 26, 11:10pm, "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote: } Subject: Re: 'fxp' driver/hardware lossage (was Re: Alexander B. Povol's m } > You can't send a packet to yourself under normal circumstances (ethernet } > is a simplex device). } } Only broken NIC chips are simplex, even the 82586 is actually capable } of hering itself talk on the wire, though most drives do not set } the chip into this mode. Either way ``ethernet is _not_ a simplex } device''. That's only true of coaxial media. Over twisted pair, if you see data start arriving on the receive pair while your transmitting then you have to assume that the data is being sent by another station and you've got a collision situation. However, you may have the option to loop back your transmitted data to your receiver after the receiver stage where collision sensing is done. I believe this is known as natural loopback. I don't think it's commonly used.