Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 14:52:25 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com> To: se@mi.uni-koeln.de (Stefan Esser) Cc: davidg@root.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-sys@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci ncr.c Message-ID: <8011.793493545@freefall.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 22 Feb 95 19:56:23 %2B0100." <199502221856.AA06334@ParC04.MI.Uni-Koeln.DE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> After having typed in the full line > > <wolf@dentaro.GUN.de> Wolfgang Stanglmeier > > and for a few weeks now > > <wolf@kintaro.cologne.de> Wolfgang Stanglmeier > > tens of times for each file in the PCI and NCR sources, > I just got tired ... Actually, this is still necessary. If we want to programatically determine who's responsible for a given change someday (perhaps putting their name in an email response field) then we NEED to follow the conventions already established. This means a standard: "first last" <uname@host> or first last <uname@host> or uname [implied: uname@freebsd.org] as we established. Ugen is right that this convention must be followed religiously for it to have any true usefulness, and I'd like to strongly encourage that all future commits (by anyone) not deviate from these rules. Thanks. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8011.793493545>