Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 11:10:24 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.980424110909.25399B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199804231600.MAA05522@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Thu, 23 Apr 1998 01:50:05 +1000 (EST), darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au said: > > > There are numerous programs like this already - ps, netstat, top, etc. > > > I'd say "deal with it". > > When I'm done with netstat, I hope to have its interface completely > separated from the actual kernel internals. It's not there yet, but I > think I have the right ideas on how to proceed. There's no reason why > the same strategy can't be taken with the process table. I haven't looked at this but wasn't this a eproc-only vs. eproc-with-entire-proc issue? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.980424110909.25399B-100000>