Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 02:17:28 +0100 From: Jean-Yves Avenard <jyavenard@gmail.com> To: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> Subject: Re: Policy on static linking ? Message-ID: <AANLkTimsykzn%2B1h-f90Jxy2VDdHk43KULnAiD8XVnWNA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110115224857.GA42408@stack.nl> References: <E1PdkJV-0007GJ-Rc@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> <AANLkTikGYtu=4E%2BPemNFQVOkQtLDgX=h%2BvCdL%2B0x4p0S@mail.gmail.com> <20110115224857.GA42408@stack.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi On 15 January 2011 23:48, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> wrote: > > The approach has been used by Debian for some time. > > Links: > http://chris.dzombak.name/blog/2010/03/building-openssl-with-symbol-versioning/ > http://chris.dzombak.name/files/openssl/openssl-0.9.8l-symbolVersioning.diff > http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1222&user=guest&pass=guest This sounds very interesting. I do have trouble understanding on how this would make a difference with how it's currently working. base openssl uses libssl.so.6 and libcrypto.so.6 current port openssl is using .so.7 So they too have different sonames; How could changing this to .so.0.9.8 for base and so.1.0.2 for port make things behave differently? JY
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimsykzn%2B1h-f90Jxy2VDdHk43KULnAiD8XVnWNA>