From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Sep 25 21:24:06 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA09967 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 21:24:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tulpi.interconnect.com.au (root@tulpi.interconnect.com.au [192.189.54.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA09889 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 21:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ahill@localhost) by tulpi.interconnect.com.au id OAA20830 (8.7.6/IDA-1.6); Thu, 26 Sep 1996 14:23:20 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 14:23:20 +1000 (EST) From: Anthony Hill To: hmmm cc: Jeremy Sigmon , "Randall D. DuCharme" , questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MS-DOS text files in UNIX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 24 Sep 1996, hmmm wrote: > apple/mac uses CR > dos/win uses LF/CR > unixes use LF > > why didn't unix choose CR as the standard EOL? > (at least we'd be left w/only 2 standards) > what a mess of such a simple stupid thing! Since UNIX precedes these other OS's by about 15 years, I would have thought if Microsoft/Apple had any interest in standards they would have followed UNIX's lead. (bit like using \ in dos instead of UNIX's /) regards, Anthony