Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:31:54 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: "Jonathan T. Sage" <sagejona@theatre.msu.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? Message-ID: <1074018714.768.26.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <400438CB.8030702@theatre.msu.edu> References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> <400409F4.3090205@freebsd.org> <400428DC.2060108@theatre.msu.edu> <20040113181911.GB432@jenny.daemon.li> <20040113182201.GA48706@voodoo.oberon.net> <400438CB.8030702@theatre.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-xTVKforDnfMBSbSnuOmf Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 13:28, Jonathan T. Sage wrote: > Kirill Ponomarew wrote: >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:19:11PM +0100, Josef El-Rayes wrote: > >=20 > >>"Jonathan T. Sage" <sagejona@theatre.msu.edu> wrote: > >> > >>>1. a lot of the commits are going to be ports related, and=20 > >>>therefore dropped immediatally. this sort of report is handled=20 > >>>wonderfully by dan @ freshports, i see no reason to duplicate=20 > >>>what he has done > >> > >>why excluding ports? i think important changes in the ports area > >>should be covered here too.=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > As Jonathan said, the freshports is the best site where you can > > get all issues about it. > >=20 > > -Kirill > Exactally, and as Mark pointed out, I think that keeping in changes to=20 > the ports infrastructure (bsd.ports.mk) would be an excellent idea. And that's the plan. As you can see from my recent email to ports@ about the bsd.gnome.mk changes, I will be updating ports@ and ports-developers@ about ports infrastructure changes under my control.=20 These will contain more detailed information than is found in the commit logs. Joe >=20 > ~j --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-xTVKforDnfMBSbSnuOmf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBABDmab2iPiv4Uz4cRAsXpAJ9tTjeX/yknm3n36tcDlUJUOCvdFgCeNB1k nkc/zcE9OWdDf/wla9v7TXY= =tWD2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xTVKforDnfMBSbSnuOmf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1074018714.768.26.camel>