From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Nov  8 06:54:10 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id GAA07293
          for stable-outgoing; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 06:54:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA07288
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 06:54:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.2/8.6.9) with ESMTP id GAA10585; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 06:50:19 -0800 (PST)
To: Craig Shrimpton <craigs@os.com>
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: The curtain is going down on 2.1-stable in 5 days! 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 08 Nov 1996 09:55:51 EST."
             <Pine.3.89.9611080953.A19812-0100000@solar.os.com> 
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 1996 06:50:19 -0800
Message-ID: <10583.847464619@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Thanks for the "heads-up."  What is the proper method for keeping a 
> 2.1.5-RELEASE kernel up to date?  Is it 2.1-STABLE (via sup) until the 12th 
> or is another method recommended?

2.1-stable via CVSup (recommended over sup) or CTM, yes.  Both will be
maintained right up until the end (and, in the case of the former, for
some time afterwards since a tag's a tag).

						Jordan