From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 15 13:52:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E050616A4CE for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:52:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (kazi.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.8.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E5B43D58 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:52:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5FDqAC8045283 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:52:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from cejkar@localhost) by kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.11/8.12.5/Submit) id i5FDqARm045281; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:52:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: kazi.fit.vutbr.cz: cejkar set sender to cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz using -f Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:52:10 +0200 From: Rudolf Cejka To: Richard Kiss Message-ID: <20040615135209.GA44753@fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20040614190735.A30698@kalamalka.gizzywump.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040614190735.A30698@kalamalka.gizzywump.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ucom* at uftdi? does not work with getty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:52:53 -0000 Richard Kiss wrote (2004/06/14): > The ports work fine with minicom and modems, but NOT with getty. The > behaviour of ucomX appears to be similar to cuaaX, not ttydX -- dialing > a modem attached to ucomX yields auto-answer and a connect just fine, > but getty does not seem to notice that the line has been picked up and > does not seem to launch the subprocess. Hello, maybe you can try to read kern/65769 - it is possible that you have the same problems as me. PHK currently works on tty implementation, but I do not know if he is going to fix this problem too. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=65769 -- Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic