From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Dec 20 2:57: 6 2000 From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 20 02:57:04 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD34437B400 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 02:57:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA07017; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:55:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Sender: des@ofug.org X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Soren Schmidt Cc: bright@wintelcom.net (Alfred Perlstein), freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Subject: Re: gensetdefs using sh(1),sed(1),grep(1) and awk(1) References: <200012201057.LAA64230@freebsd.dk> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 20 Dec 2000 11:55:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: Soren Schmidt's message of "Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:57:31 +0100 (CET)" Message-ID: Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Soren Schmidt writes: > Anyhow its a moot point, -current is so fragile its hard to use anyways... That's generally not true either, but you apparently don't care to hear my opinion, so I'll just shut up. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message