From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul  5 22:24:09 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1B516A41C
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  5 Jul 2005 22:24:09 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org)
Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD30043D49
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  5 Jul 2005 22:24:09 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org)
Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org
	(vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98])
	by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AA53203E0;
	Wed,  6 Jul 2005 00:24:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B6209405B; Wed,  6 Jul 2005 00:24:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 00:24:12 +0200
From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
To: Jon Door <jondoor@udor.net>
Message-ID: <20050705222412.GQ73907@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
References: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<42C76DF0.8070307@magnesium.net>
	<20050703055842.GA1933@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<42C805F2.4060103@udor.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <42C805F2.4060103@udor.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 22:24:10 -0000

Hi Jon,

> Does it make sense to introduce a CFLAGS_PORTS option? Basically an 
> override used when compiling ports as opposed to world?

I would vote for it.  I'm working on integrating ProPolice on the base
system, and it would be worth to have the ability to compile either
base system or ports without stack protection, for instance.
Furthermore this is not a great change in the makefiles, rather
something invisible for those who don't want to use it, and pretty handy
for those who might need it.

If some people are interested, I can make a patch upon request.

Regards,
-- 
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >