Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:09:59 -0500 From: Gary Jackson <bargle@umiacs.umd.edu> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Reply Hazy (Encrypted VPN across FBSD, W2k, RHL, etc...) Message-ID: <200110302109.QAA13104@leviathan.umiacs.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 30 Oct 2001 12:56:56 PST." <200110302056.f9UKuuv08305@arch20m.dellroad.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Archie Cobbs wrote: >That's only required if you want to do compression, which is optional. >So the net/mpd-netgraph port will do PPTP with encryption but not >compression. Ah, cool. >> Option (2) looks even less likely. I've only been able to find one >> implementation of l2tp, and it looks like it's still a pretty flaky >> piece of software that hasn't been integrated with IPSec. > >You can configure Win2k to do pure IPSec without the L2TP part, >and this works with FreeBSD/IPSec/racoon. Search the MSoft knowledge >base for how to configure it this way (it's non-trivial). I think I'll probably stick to the PPTP method, since I may try and pitch this to my boss at some point. I'll take a look at IPSec without L2TP mechanism, though. Thanks for the help! -- Gary Jackson bargle@umiacs.umd.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110302109.QAA13104>