Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:40:16 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <conrads@cox.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Library minor versions conflicting with PLIST with no minor versions Message-ID: <200702162340.l1GNeGYs052052@serene.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: <20070215064005.GA13738@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200702150532.l1F5Wp8o020384@serene.no-ip.org> <20070215064005.GA13738@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:40:06 -0500 Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:32:51PM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > I know I've seen a few other reports of this problem in the lists > > recently, and am just wondering if anyone has anything further to > > report. > > > > I've been seeing the odd port here and there building libraries with > > minor version numbers included in the filenames, whereas the PLIST > > specifies only the major version numbers, or vice versa. This is > > causing other ports to fail to link properly, in some cases where > > the dependent port is expecting the library with the minor number > > included, and others where the dependent port is expecting the > > library without the minor number. > > > > Very odd behavior, and it's only cropped up within the last week or > > two. I can't figure out what the heck's going on here. > > > > This is under 7.0-CURRENT on the amd64 arch, by the way. > > > > Anyone? > > See the heads up I sent the other week. > > Kris Could you be a little more specific? Which list did you send it to? Did it have "Heads Up" in the Subject line? -- Conrad J. Sabatier <conrads@cox.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702162340.l1GNeGYs052052>