Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:35:55 -0500 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> To: des@des.no Cc: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? Message-ID: <20040113183555.GA7902@online.fr> In-Reply-To: <xzp65ffuceu.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > You can't expect them to take the initiative in submitting information > for the status reports. Experience shows that they will be > enthusiastic about your undertaking for about three minutes and then > forget about it. > > You can however expect them to answer questions about their work if > you can't figure things out on your own. And having obtained the answers, may I suggest a site to post them at: kerneltrap.org. This, together with lwn.net, is one of the most informative sites about fresh developments in the linux kernel; but kerneltrap.org also covers the BSDs. So no need to reinvent the wheel; if the FreeBSD contributions to kerneltrap can be increased just a bit, it would be a very useful archive (in fact it already is). Rahul
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040113183555.GA7902>