From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Tue Dec 15 16:51:45 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45614BBB95 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CwPRj5Nhcz4Zj3 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B8EF04BBB94; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B794BBAC2 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CwPRj451zz4ZnX for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (v-critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.55.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DACE78A3C7; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 0BFGpg86026113 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:51:42 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: (from phk@localhost) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 0BFGpfrF026112; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:51:41 GMT (envelope-from phk) To: Warner Losh cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Should/does loader.efi respect the "bootme" GPT attribute ? In-reply-to: From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" References: <25469.1608040822@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <26110.1608051101.1@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:51:41 +0000 Message-ID: <26111.1608051101@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4CwPRj451zz4ZnX X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:51:45 -0000 -------- Warner Losh writes: > It is intentional. UEFI really doesn't want you using non-standard > partition flags to determine boot order. So how would one go about doing "boot0/nanobsd-style" dual root the "proper" way in an UEFI environment ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.