From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 5 14:48:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E936B16A40F; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:48:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2416543D45; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:48:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k95Emqox062635; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:48:52 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id k95Emq0A062634; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:48:52 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:48:52 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20061005144852.GA60575@svzserv.kemerovo.su> References: <451F6E8E.8020301@freebsd.org> <4523916C.1080905@crc.u-strasbg.fr> <20061004163622.GA35298@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061004173637.GA66349@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20061005102923.N84384@fledge.watson.org> <20061005115140.GA47746@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20061005130829.A46123@fledge.watson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061005130829.A46123@fledge.watson.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:48:56 -0000 On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:09:27PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > >It's definetely a regression from 4.11-STABLE that runs fine on this > >system with ACPI fully enabled Hmm, I was wrong about 4.11 using ACPI - it does not use it here really, it uses "good old" APM. > It would be interesting to know how 4.x probes the hardware vs. how it > apperas in the 6.x dmesg. 4.11-STABLE: fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 6.2-PRERELEASE: fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f0 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 Eugene Grosbein