From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 13 16:01:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6845516A401 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-227-250.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5544713C467 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1DG0xRm027440; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:00:59 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20070213095917.0254c760@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:00:52 -0600 To: Robert Fitzpatrick , FreeBSD From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <1171381674.4205.54.camel@columbus.webtent.org> References: <1171381674.4205.54.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: BIND slave records not updating X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:01:38 -0000 I run multiple FreeBSD versions with Bind and have not had a problem with records being updated. Are you properly setting the new serial numbers in the master record files? -Derek At 09:47 AM 2/13/2007, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: >I'm not a member of any bind list, so I was hoping to be able to ask my >question here. I have primary DNS with bind 9.2.4 on Linux servers where >there are web GUI's for management. I keep slave records on two FreeBSD >servers that serve as our ns1 and ns2, one is 6.1 with the bind port >bind9-9.3.3 and it works fine. The other is FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE with >bind9-base-9.3.4, not sure what the base difference is, can someone tell >me? This 5.4 server is not updating when changes are made to the >primary. I see in the logs on the primary that notifies are sent and the >9.3.3 server, which is at a different facility, updates within minutes, >the 5.4 machine on the local network does not. I can't find any bind log >information in /var/log/messages on the FreeBSD servers, where would >that be? I have to remove the '.bak' zone file and restart the bind >process, then it brings over the new zone file as it should re-creating >the '.bak' file. I checked the perms on all the files involved, >comparing to the 6.1 machine. The zone files all owned by the bind >process user. > >zone "example.com" { > type slave; > file "slave/example.com.bak"; > masters { 10.0.0.48; }; > allow-query { 0.0.0.0/0; }; >}; >esmtp# ls -lah /var/named/etc/namedb/slave/tpghotels.com.bak >-rw-r--r-- 1 bind wheel 635B Feb 13 08:19 >/var/named/etc/namedb/slave/example.com.bak > >Again, this exact same setup on the other BSD server works perfectly. >The allow-transfer on the primary seems to be working fine since >deleting the zone file on the slave and restarting pulls the zone fine. >This is our workaround for now, but a pain. > >Is there a problem with running the different bind9 versions? I can't >really do anything about the primary server considering we rely on yum >and recommended updates by the system repositories. So, should I keep my >slave BSD boxes on that same version 9.2.4? > >Thanks in advance! > >-- >Robert > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. >MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.