From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 22 3: 9: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E351514DE1 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 03:08:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Received: from localhost (fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA67302; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 16:59:59 +0700 (NSS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 16:59:59 +0700 (NSS) From: Max Khon To: Dominic Mitchell Cc: "David E. Cross" , Oscar Bonilla , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PAM & LDAP in FreeBSD, and userfs too. In-Reply-To: <19990719204417.A5796@palmerharvey.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, there! On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 12:29:48PM -0400, David E. Cross wrote: > > I thought now would be a good time to chime in on some of my wild schemes... > > > > The reason I am interested in 'userfs' is to enable me to write a version > > of 'nsd'. [...] > Lovely. Sounds like a much better way to do the Solaris/Linux (and > NetBSD?) /etc/nsswitch.conf stuff. On Solaris at least, this is > implemented using masses of weird shared objects... PAM is also "using masses of weird shared objects" but nevertheless it's quite usable /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message