From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 25 05:06:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C10B172; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 05:06:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30538FC08; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 05:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hm9so2118045wib.13 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:06:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=e9dpPe6YEG78iWsNHoO+rb7aW+KrqYE+Yuoz3+GNsrI=; b=BvMTXWTRsAmbaw438kuWweDz9IzMN0PLumwEDOeJRn9FS/ox1Lx41mEkfat8mRG5x+ o2NYvfq0dALHLP+0GmF3TD49vU4fLd0ivzYrxuE7CPLDvnOzCNhFGzjKq9TucCWp6lA6 68MD4d5DCK+N5NJEsF1gGM29Ao0bQXVrA8lMzAbsv8RtYaHtH/lMQH7b7n3exKX4DIOb z2COqPybNrVmW6PfOfUt8ZgPQIdyk7RP42fFr64vD8ci2HUUy43ExecY7KQ0onB901Qh UJ/kATOVe6or0zoaQoN44x/xujybvS1ZIA0eLq4vKQhcGwySBEqhpDt0GgNPuMT0sdVh h1BA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.103.106 with SMTP id fv10mr12101489wib.19.1353819983497; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:06:23 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.57.9 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:06:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50B16846.5000805@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:06:23 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GDk3whbq_ETHAAkoV_oo7EcrPhI Message-ID: Subject: Re: wifi + wpa_supplicant in 9.1-RC3 From: Adrian Chadd To: Kevin Oberman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Nathan Whitehorn X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 05:06:25 -0000 On 24 November 2012 20:58, Kevin Oberman wrote: > iwn support N, but my experience has not been good. With a 'G' > connection to my AP, I get about 20 Mbps, but when I turn on 'N', it > drops to about 8 Mbps. I would not assume that 'N' is going to work > better with the current software. Have you filed a bug about this? Bernhard has done a pretty amazing job at getting iwn(4) 802.11n support working quite well. Adrian