From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 25 14:49:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B190B1065672 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 14:49:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A58C8FC17 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 14:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4PEn3PI075404; Fri, 25 May 2012 15:49:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <4FBF9BDF.4020208@qeng-ho.org> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:49:03 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120425 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Bonnet References: <4FBF3EA9.2000103@esiee.fr> <4FBF8F38.9070300@qeng-ho.org> <4FBF9356.7040504@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: <4FBF9356.7040504@esiee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Cloud" software ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 14:49:12 -0000 On 05/25/12 15:12, Frank Bonnet wrote: > On 05/25/2012 04:04 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> >>> With apologies to Joni Mitchell: >>> >>> I've looked at clouds from both sides now, >>> From up and down, and still somehow, >>> It's cloud illusions I recall, >>> I really don't know clouds, at all. >>> >>> Well, someone had to say it. :-) It summarises the marketing hype >>> perfectly. >> >> fashion is quite often deciding factor not just in clothes. Actually >> it works just the same in IT. What is funny with "cloud computing" >> (new fashion trend) is that isn't defined at all. most probably >> marketing people found out that it is not needed to define anything to >> make people buy....ANYTHING. > > Well ... My goal was NOT to start a flame war around the "cloud" term ... I wasn't flaming, just remarking on the fact that the meaning of "cloud" depends on the company that is trying to sell you cloud related products. > next time I'll choose better words :-) A bit more specific would be useful. > we would like to offer to our students and professors > a kind of private cloud to access/manipulate their personnal data > from almost anywhere and with almost any devices could be taken to mean anything from WebDAV/Dropbox functionality to Hadoop type processing or data mining. What sort of and how much "manipulation" is needed? If you answer that it would let us help you more.