From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 19:32:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B7616A404 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B0BF13C46B for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 19:32:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 72694 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2007 22:32:39 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2007 22:32:39 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 180289, updated: 7.03.2007] Message-ID: <000e01c760ef$5d445cc0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "Charles Shannon Hendrix" , References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org><20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan><20070307112308.7da56ccd@daydream.goid.lan> <20070307134918.2ec68ebd@daydream.goid.lan> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:32:36 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Cc: Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:32:41 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Shannon Hendrix" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:49 PM Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:30:12 +0100 > Ivan Voras wrote: > >> Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: >> > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:11:24 +0100 >> > Ivan Voras wrote: >> > >> >> Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: >> >> >> >>> BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.1) >> >> Off-topic: Who or what is the origin of the "wht" version? One of the >> >> nice things about unixbench is that it hadn't changed from 1997, but now >> >> most Linux variants use the -wht version that has completely different >> >> baselines and results from the "normal" version? >> > >> > It's a version created for the website: webhostingtalk.com. >> > >> > It was created to have a stable and standard benchmark. >> >> Beautiful - they fiddled with the baselines but still managed not to see >> the obvious problem in execl() call in the execl benchmark for 64-bit >> platform. > > Or maybe they just don't care? > > It seems to me they use the software a lot and it serves their purposes. > It's just a standardized version and run script that they use to evaluate web > servers. Hmm. if the whole world uses wht version of unixbench maybe someone should update freebsd ports version to this wht version, because otherwise we cannot compare anything else than freebsd. Not good. -- Artem