From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 13 08:51:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36F716A4CE for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 08:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5913043D48 for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 08:51:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4DFpAP8048455; Thu, 13 May 2004 08:51:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i4DFp9hH006637; Thu, 13 May 2004 08:51:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i4DFp9Uu006636; Thu, 13 May 2004 08:51:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 08:51:09 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Roman Kurakin Message-ID: <20040513155109.GB6572@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <40A26162.9030607@cronyx.ru> <20040512.200542.09569104.imp@bsdimp.com> <40A37468.3060608@cronyx.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40A37468.3060608@cronyx.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: Sio & Puc memory mapped X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 15:51:29 -0000 On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 05:13:12PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: > M. Warner Losh wrote: > > >In message: <40A26162.9030607@cronyx.ru> > > Roman Kurakin writes: > >: Does any body workin on support for memory mapped serial adapters? > > > >uart should support it. You may be able to enhance puc to attach uart > >to your card. > > > > > I didn't notice that mem-cards have uart(4) type in puc(4) driver when I > started to dig. They don't. uart(4) is a replacement for sio(4), not a an addendum to it. > I was sure that it should be sio part. So was I. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net